Skip to main content

SG Budget 2023 : The true benefit of the increased income ceiling.

 

This only affects people who will experience an increase in annual contribution to CPF.

Trade-off

The "cost" of this $2000 increase would mean that employees would have to contribute $400 X 12 = $4,800.

But the first gain would be the 17% employer contribution that wasn’t received in the past.
This amounts to $340 X 12 = $4,080.

By giving up $4800 and I get an additional $4,080 a month. That’s like an 85% return and brings the total contribution to an auspicious $8880 (HUAT AH)

To sweeten the deal, the money contributed would earn interest and snowball through the effects of compounding.

This would be way more powerful than just having $4,800 in cash. 

What’s more

When the total contribution to CPF increases, we can’t forget our good friend IRAS.

Employee’s CPF contribution is eligible for CPF relief

This would mean that the assessable income for the year would reduce by $4800.  

Referring to IRAS’s website:


Assuming that the monthly salary is $8,000 with no bonus, the assessable income for the year would be $96,000. The income tax rate would be 11.5% and will result in savings of $552.

However, if your existing reliefs are more than $16,000,  then the additional offset will apply to the 7% tax rate. This would in turn lead to a savings of $336. 

From a return perspective, the earlier return of 85% increased to 96.5% (@11.5%) or 92% (@7%).

Now, that’s a pleasant surprise…

What's next?

[Update: I've just found out that RSTU is not subjected to the annual contribution limit. Hence the previous conclusion has changed.] 

I’ll continue with my RSTU strategy until I hit FRS. 

On top of that, I would also manually transfer the additional amount contributed to CPF OA over to CPF SA to speed up the process to hit FRS. 

Other Impacts

This essentially only affects people who are looking at using CPF’s RSTU to fund the CPF SA to achieve a Full Retirement Sum (FRS).

In the last article, the number “$37,740” kept appearing in the later analysis. That really caught my attention.

When the salary contribution limit hits $8,000 a month, the total yearly contribution becomes $35,520.

Given that the annual contribution limit is $37,740, the remaining allowable contribution is $2,220.

This would be achieved with a bonus of $6000.

Well, I’m not sure if employers are going to reduce bonus post this change, but topping up $8000 to my SA might no longer be an option.

It also makes no sense to front-run my CPF contribution. If I really want to, all I need to do is move the money from OA to SA. This transferred amount will not be included in the “reserved sum”, which is a better alternative than RSTU.

Ok, so what?

Well, it depends…

If it’s about tax rebates – I’ll most likely need to graduate from CPF’s RSTU and start topping-up SRS

If it’s about hitting FRS with my own contribution and letting the salary contribution limit break.
It might be worth considering topping up via OA earlier, especially if I’m not far from FRS.

That said, doing nothing is also perfectly fine.

This is because instead of topping up $8,000, this contributes $880 more with only a $4,800 outlay.
The only step I need to do is to manually transfer the difference from OA to SA. 


Please support me by following and liking my pages below:










Popular posts from this blog

Freehold premium worth meh?

After buying my house, I started reading up on property information and how the market works. Some of the objections I heard from my friends are: These days no one cares about Freehold(FH) any more. There’s no need to care about lease decay, you won’t stay that long anyway. So it got me thinking, is that really the case?   Better Location If we look at HDBs, there is constant renewal by the GRCs to enhance their value, with better amenities, social support centres, connectivity and covered walkway. In terms of planning, it also makes sense to plan the train stations in a way that has the minimum impact on existing buildings. Next, creates land value through further development around the vicinity. That could mean that future development of the land parcels near the Station is likely going to be new HDBs or GLS > Condos In addition, selling the GLS at these locations would help attract developer interest and strengthen the reserves.  It is essentially a p...

Getting my house…

  [Update: I have updated that part on the last 5% downpayment after clarifying]  Following my last article , I went on to consider my housing options. In terms of HDB, there were 4 new MOP projects available but I couldn’t get over the fact that I would have to negotiate the price, secure the OTP before doing the Fengshui review. I could shortlist the units first, do the fengshui review. Then proceed with the viewing and negotiations, but the house might not be available anymore. So what did I just spend money for?    My next options which were completed Condos near my house around the Geylang Lorong 30 – 40 and Tanjong Katong Road. They were mostly freehold and affordable. The only issue is that I'm not ready to commit everything now. The other issue was that the development size was normally quite small implying a lack of transactions on price clarity and higher maintenance fee.   This brought me to the last option, which was to look at new launches.  A...

The Ultimate Asset Protection

  [29 Jun : Update - I've reached out to the insure updated the responses below, marked in green]  I'm revisiting this as I was offered to buy Mortgage insurance package after buying my house. In my case, I already had an existing term policy bought in 2015 with asset protection in mind. However, this coverage isn’t enough to cover the full loan. For context, I asked for quotes on mortgage insurance to cover 1.25 mil till 65. The annual premium was $800 – $870. The current term I have covers 1 mil for about $1000. This is even after buying it 8 years ago. I wouldn’t discuss in detail the pros and cons of mortgage insurance vs term insurance or why mortgage insurance is essential as this has already been covered. Esssentially, I’m not going ahead with mortgage insurance as term insurance isn’t quantum-reducing. As I pay down the loan, this would provide a residual payout for my family. I feel the trade-off of $100-$200 is justified. If I can’t cover the shortfall, then t...